Sonnet 71 And Annabel Lee Analysis - 1412 Words

â€Å"Sonnet 71† written by William Shakespeare, and â€Å"Annabel Lee† written by Edgar Allen Poe are two poems written with a common theme but also had distinct differences. A similarity shared in these poems is both poets putting their lovers first and show nothing but love for them. Shakespeare focuses on how he does not want his loved ones to mourn his death. Instead he wants them to remember he loved them, but as his body decays their love should as well. Poe writes about his lover, who was more than a crush as a child, it turned into a lifetime of love. He tells the readers about his lover dying and how he will not be able to completely live again. These poems both shared the theme of death and how painful this experience can be for†¦show more content†¦Both â€Å"Sonnet 71† and â€Å"Annabel Lee’s† stanzas contain a rhyme scheme. In the mechanics, they are different from each other. In Shakespeare’s poem, every other line rhymes, followed by the couplet which does not. Each verse in â€Å"Sonnet 71† is ten syllables and is written in iambic pentameter. It consists of three quatrains and a couplet. As for Poe’s â€Å"Annabel Lee,† it is also written in iambic pentameter. This poem also uses repetition. â€Å"In this kingdom by the sea,† (8) is seen variously throughout the poem. In the beginning of Shakespeare’s â€Å"Sonnet 71,† he says, â€Å"No longer mourn for me when I am dead† (1). He is writing to his loved ones telling them to not mourn his death when he passes. He wants them to forget about him, so they do not have to go through the pain that death brings upon people. Shakespeare says, â€Å"Give warning to the world that I am fled† (3), he wants the readers to announce to everyone that he is no longer here and that they should not spend their time grieving over this loss. Instead, he wants his loved ones to remember the li fe they had together in a positive way, he does not want anyone upset over his passing. Shakespeare believes that if people forget about him, it will be easier to go on with their lives. Love can leave people with a scar so deep even through the experience of death. The overall theme of â€Å"Sonnet 71† is when a loved one’s time comes, you should not mourn their death instead,

`` Utopia `` By John De Mol - 1719 Words

Ever since humans have existed on this earth the idea of a perfect world has been experimented with. Some examples are Brook Farm in Massachusetts, Fruitland also in Massachusetts, and one of the biggest â€Å"perfect world† is Jonestown in Guyana. All these â€Å"perfect societies† was attempted, but never succeeded. A positive perfect world, where every single member living in it joyfully and without worries is a Utopia. Dutch media tycoon John de Mol once said, â€Å" Utopia is a positive and constructive program that gives people the opportunity, if you can start all over again, start from scratch and create laws and make decisions, will you be able to build a society that is better than the one we have; will it be chaos or happiness†. I know for me my mind automatically thinks about the changes I would make in this world to make it perfect when I hear or see something I don t like. It just an automatic switch in my head. It happens to most people believe or not it happens. But who wouldn t want to make this world our own we all are a little bit selfish. Who wouldn t want to get rid of all the crimes, share all our riches with everyone, create a place where no one is judged, and produce an atmosphere where it s safe for our next generation to run around. Philosopher and author Thomas More would sure love to see all of these things happen. Thomas More wrote the first formal Utopia so he came up with this good or bad (however you want to view it) Utopia idea.Sir More imagined a

Damodaran on Valuation Security Analysis

Question: Discuss about the Damodaran on Valuation for Security Analysis. Answer: Introduction: Risk teams act like the defenders of the organization. Many risk and security teams will take the position that it is their job to protect the organization. That was why they were hired, and that is what they will do. This leads to multiple bad behaviors, such as telling the business units what they can and cannot do, banging a shoe on the table to demand budget in the name of protecting the organization, and fundamentally ignoring the needs of the business. Fundamentally adopting the role of the "protector" puts risk professionals in an adversarial position to the mission. In addition to being ineffective, this also reinforces that outdated dogma that this is just a technical problem, handled by technical people, buried in IT. In a risk-engaged culture, the dialogue is not about how to protect the business, but how to accomplish the business vision while engaging in appropriate risks (Lakshmi, 2016). It's a simple, but powerful dialogue change from "Here are all the risks with that idea" to "Here's how we can make that happen, given your budget and the probable risks we'll face." Mechanism of Financing Risk management is an increasing area of focus for most organizations, as risk profile complexity and interconnected relationships grow explosively. According to a 2016 survey of risk executives by the Risk and Insurance Management Society, 74% of respondents state that their ability to forecast critical risks will be more difficult in three years. Moreover, the leading obstacle to forecasting critical risks noted by these executives is the continued lack of cross-organization collaboration. To understand the full scope of risk, organizations require a comprehensive view across all business units and risk and compliance functions, as well as key business partners, suppliers and outsourced entities. As a result, new technology solutions are emerging to increase the collaborative nature of risk management, both within and external to the organization. Risk Management Model Over the past decade, risk management programs have matured to focus on more than just compliance and on the interconnected nature of operational risk across an enterprise. Gartner defines this approach to risk management as integrated risk management (IRM). IRM is a set of practices and processes supported by a risk-aware culture and enabling technologies that improve decision making and performance through an integrated view of how well an organization manages its unique set of risks. New leaders in digital risk also need the right metrics to make better business decisions by linking risk and performance. Risk metrics can also be used to direct audit and compliance resources to focus on the right areas rather than succumbing to the dreaded "check-the-box" syndrome. Gartner's research focus in 2017 will include views on how companies can link risk management and corporate performance management via metrics (Lakshmi, 2016). Using key risk indicators tied to key performance indicators , business leaders can deploy risk management resources to areas that will have the greatest impact on the future success of the business (Lau, 2016). Fire and engineering risk control Finally, to support your efforts to manage these new risks, you need the right systems. Gartner will explore the current trends for use of IRM solutions in areas such as legal, e-discovery and operational risk management. Gartner will also discuss new and future trends around the evolution of digital risk management technology. It also means accountability is measured in defensibility of decisions, and not a proxy for who to discipline when something goes wrong. Defensibility means that stakeholders would agree that the best decision was made with the information available at the time. Bad outcomes may trigger a review of defensibility, but bad outcomes do not equate to poor defensibility. A good risk-engaged culture supports a common understanding of defensibility (Damodaran, 2016). Risk-engaged cultures are sadly lacking in many organizations, and this undermines the very foundation of any risk process. If you don't have a good risk-engaged culture, then, regardless of process, decisions will not be defensible. Advantages of Risk Captive Culture Transparency is a very hard culture shift, but is absolutely necessary. It exposes the unwanted reality that you can't eliminate risk. When risk decisions are made, by definition, there will be residual risk, and many organizations suffer from reluctance to be transparent about known risks they have consciously chosen to not address. Challenges include everything from legal liability to looking bad in front of peers, management, the board, internal audit, regulators, customers, etc. However, given that there is no such thing as perfect protection, this transparency is only a reflection of reality. The benefit is that it creates better decision making and prioritization, which is good business (Damodaran, 2016). The failures of a poor risk-engaged culture are easy to spot by those who understand good risk engagement, but the impact is hard to explain to executives who have poor risk engagement. Following are some simple red flags for failing risk culture. Speculative Risk Cannot be insured It is common for executives who lack understanding of technology dependencies on business outcomes and are tired of reading headlines about hacking to declare that there is no acceptable level of risk. These are people who believe that, with the right investment and the right people, it is possible to prevent all possible security failures. There are board members who only invite the CIO to report to the board on cybersecurity so that the CIO can tell them, "Everything is going to be OK." It isn't. That isn't how technology risk works, but that gap in understanding and expectations makes it nearly impossible to engage these executives in an appropriate risk-based conversation. That is a failure of risk culture. On the other side of the spectrum, one Gartner client reported that executive management had created a sweeping and direct message to the entire organization: "Engage in more risk." There were good reasons for this, including a belief that the organization had become stagnant and predictable. Decision makers were reluctant to do most things for fear of something going wrong, and this had stifled innovation. Unfortunately this was done with no guidelines and, somewhat predictably, many managers immediately wanted to materially lower investment in cybersecurity and other technology controls where they saw no benefit. While it is possible that this an appropriate decision, the risk culture failure was that they were doing this with little or no knowledge of the attendant risks; they just wanted to jump (without a parachute). Methods of Individual Risk Rating An inconsiderate engagement of risk. Many organizations have created risk acceptance forms as a mechanism to engage executives. Gartner's experience indicates there appear to be only two types of people: those that will sign anything to get what they want, and those that won't sign anything no matter what it costs them. In both cases, the failure is not the amount of risk that is accepted, but rather the abdication of understanding the risk and the conscious decision making that makes a risk-based approach work. Engaging with risk is not about filling out a form, but in understanding all of the risks, including technology, time, cost and mission success, and determining the best way to achieve goals within an acceptable level of risk. Legal Liabilities Failures of accountability. In most organizations, "accountability" means "Who do we fire when something goes wrong?" This attitude results in a situation where no one wants to engage in any type of risk acceptance because the consequences are clear. This kills the proper engagement of any type of risk. Accountability is a critical success factor in a risk-based approach. As your risk culture evolves, accountability should more appropriately be dependent on the defensibility of the decisions that were made. Risks are always present and failures from time to time are inevitable, but when something goes wrong, the organizations should look back at the decisions that were made. If they were informed decisions with good, defensible reasoning for choosing a course of action, then it was a good risk to take. Don't fire someone for accepting a risk; fire him or her for not understanding the risk accepted. Risk Liability Failure to explain the risk. A risk culture does not sit only with non-IT executives. Risk and security teams also fail when they can't explain risk in terms of business outcomes. Executives cannot be expected to understand risks if they are explained poorly and buried in technology jargon. As in our stuntman example, a film director or producer should not be expected to understand the mechanics of practical effects such that they can independently make the call on what is acceptable. But neither can the stuntman compromise the director's vision simply because all risks can't be avoided. Indeed, engagement is the process of dialogue and compromise about what is possible with the limits of technology, time, cost and risk, and that dialogue and compromise must be two-way and thoughtful. Liability Crisis Senior business and technology leaders need to develop a narrative about risk in their enterprise. This narrative isn't about setting the "rules of engagement," but about defining the "commander's intent." It should include principles and ideals such as: "The customer experience is how we win; we must not jeopardize that experience through action or inaction." The narrative provides a "moral compass" of how the organization views risk and how risk-engaged decision making should take place. Moreover, it provides a framework for dialogue and how various stakeholders discuss risks. While this may seem trite and simple, such principles have powerful and lingering cultural effects. Consider the following two statements: "Failure is not an option" versus "Fail fast, fail early, fail often." Consider how those two statements of commander's intent would be reflected in organizational risk culture and the ongoing dialogue about risk. Simply stating publicly how the organization views risk, from the top down, and creating a framework for stakeholders to discuss and engage with risk can have a powerful impact on risk culture. References: Lakshmi, T. M., Martin, A., Venkatesan, V. P. (2016). A Genetic Bankrupt Ratio Analysis Tool Using a Genetic Algorithm to Identify Influencing Financial Ratios.IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,20(1), 38-51. Damodaran, A. (2016).Damodaran on valuation: security analysis for investment and corporate finance(Vol. 324). John Wiley Sons. Lau, C. (2016). Financial Management. Khan, M. N., Khokhar, I. (2015). The Effect Of Selected Financial Ratios On Profitability: An Empirical Analysis Of Listed Firms Of Cement Sector In Saudi Arabia.Quarterly Journal of Econometrics Research,1(1), 1-12. Robinson, T. R., Henry, E., Pirie, W. L., Broihahn, M. A. (2015).International financial statement analysis. John Wiley Sons. Hoberg, G., Maksimovic, V. (2015). Redefining financial constraints: a text-based analysis.Review of Financial Studies,28(5), 1312-1352.

Women Struggling From Their Fate

It is amazing to know how people perceive the world differently. People from various walks of life have different interpretation of daily experiences. This is so clear when discussing the issues that arise in stories by great authors. In this essay, we take a look at the perception towards women struggling to gain control over their fates as written by Kate Chopin, Merge Piercy and Gilman in their stories the Story of an Hour, Barbie Doll and Yellow Wallpaper respectively.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Women Struggling From Their Fate specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In the Story of an Hour, Kate Chopin presents an often unheard view about marriage. Chopin has tackled the issue of marriage and selfhood concept by portraying Mrs. Louise Mallard, as a strong woman. This happened due to her reaction when she is informed about the death of her husband in train accident. The reader has a perception that Mrs. Louise would be greatly affected by the death of her husband when she learns it, but this is not the case. Instead Mrs. Louise Ironically feels a relieved when she receives the bad news. Her reaction probably shows that death does not necessarily cause grief to the close family members. One thing has to die for another to thrive as the death of Louise could have opened the door to a fresh new start of a life with so much freedom. Kate Chopin seems to have a lot of things in common with her husband Louise Mallard who is also a major protagonist. They both lived during the period when women had very limited rights and privileged, prejudiced based on their gender. During this era women were required to be very submissive to their husbands. Their opinions were not regarded since women were meant to be seen, but not heard. During those days, marriage was considered a sacred institution making divorce a rare thing. In the event that as divorce was necessary, the man would automatically have the legal of controlling of all of the property and children that he had with his woman (Hicks 1). Chopin grew up in a male dominated environment. She writes many controversial stories on abusive relationship and unhappy marriage. There were a lot of things that she did that were considered contrary to the societal norms of that period. Mrs. Louise Mallard’s emotions changes from one state to another within an hour. She gets upset by the sad news of the death of a loved one but when she comes out of the room she seem to have already accepted the situation and adapting to the new situation. Though she is saddened by her husband’s death, she at once gets delighted by the reflection of her awaiting freedom. Her passion for life is so evident. She anticipates for her new life in the future and how she would live as a free woman enjoying absolute freedom. As she begins to savor the sweet sense of freedom, her husband shows up at their house still breathing. On seeing him, she i s shocked and dies because of the reality that strikes her. She is unable to bare the drastic change of emotion on learning that her husband was actually not dead. This will eventually deny her the freedom she has been longing for (Ostman 6).Advertising Looking for essay on gender studies? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In the poem â€Å"Barbie Doll†, author Marge Piercy makes use of four paragraphs to scornfully describe the cultural and societal expectations of the girl child from her birth, the bringing up, life and death. A girl faces some serious social problems as she grows up in the community. These challenges include issues such as peer cruelty and societal pressure to conform to its normal and keep a certain kind of image of a woman which that society deems ‘ideal image of a woman’. A girl is shown to have a life that is full of challenges and less options to enjoy it. The society is depicting it to begin at birth, upbringing, the girl gets married and finally faces sad death. This literary piece depicts such life as boring and very short. The poem is presented in a tone of depression and sadness, depicting the culturally unacceptable image of our society. When this girl is born, she is â€Å"presented with dolls that did pee-pee/and miniature GE stoves and irons/and wee lipsticks the color of cherry candy† (Piercy 4). This exposes her to unwittingly ideals and expectations of society. The girl was given toys that were designed to teach her to adapt the life of a wife which was basically that of looking. This type of influence inadvertently pulls the girl into a different world or her subconscious without her noticing. When she hits puberty the sponge rings, sending a cascade of awareness over her. One of her classmates proclaimed to her that â€Å"you have a great big nose and fat legs† (Piercy 6). These nine simple words are not the foolish opinion of an imma ture classmate, but devastating news. Her attempts to conform to the ideals that the society teaches are no longer subconscious rather deliberate. She felt bad that she did not fit in these ideals. She kept going to and fro to her friends apologizing for her â€Å"fat nose on thick legs† which was all anyone could see. To her, no one saw that â€Å"she was healthy, tested intelligent, possessed strong arms and back, abundant sexual drive and manual dexterity† (Piercy 9), which are all good qualities, but her package wasn’t perfect. The societal pressures follow certain way of life or perception of a beautiful and attractive girl became and ultimately notion of a good woman faded away. She therefore cut her nose off and her legs too to offer them as her body and soul to the baseless societal pressures (Piercy L 12-15). She could have literally cut her nose and legs off but she sought to have them replaced by new technology of plastic surgery. This drained her phy sically and emotionally in attempts to get what society wanted her to get.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Women Struggling From Their Fate specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The fairy-tale about â€Å"Barbie Doll† depicts the society as being able to cause very destructive consequences because of the enormous pressure it puts on women requiring them to behave in certain ways of life like the looks and conduct in public. Gender roles weaken women’s self-confidence and cause havoc on their self-esteem. Piercy suggests that the creator of Barbie doll has participated actively in the male dominated society of the â€Å"patriarchal societal system† by promoting women stereotypes. As one of the leading toy selling in US, Barbie dolls have used the strategy of idealizing the female body, such that it have turned to be an iconic in the American culture. Parents purchase these dolls for their daughter s, who in turn try to attempt to imitate Barbie’s form, presentation and the values that it embodies. This symbolizes as a beautiful, though tasteless, blonde who does just anything she is told to (Beer 5). In the Yellow Wallpaper, it shows female person undergoing â€Å"treatment† for anxiety, a condition that signifies worry. It is ironical that the doctor happens to be her own husband. She is put in a room which was earlier on occupied by a mentally challenged patient. After a few weeks, the woman starts portraying symptoms of being paranoid and experienced hallucinations regularly. All the way through the story, the woman is seen to constantly refer to the yellow wallpaper (Mikolajczyk 67). The first issue that arises in the story is when interpreting the meaning(s) behind the wallpaper. The yellow color could possibly infer something concerning insanity which makes the woman to repeatedly refer yellow wallpaper patterns which are peeling off the walls. More to the point, the patterns could be suggestive of chaos erupting from orderliness. It is obvious looking at the number of times she mentions the wall pattern that it has a great impact on the mental condition of the woman. She could be delusional seeing woman move behind the wallpaper, as if she wants to break out from it. This could in fact imply that it is a ‘reflection’ of herself in the wallpaper or it she could just be hallucinating that someone behind the wall. At the end of the story, she assumes on the role of a â€Å"creeping† woman. She is seen to follow a blotch around the room and over the body of her husband who has fainted. In short, the woman has been trapped in the paper and tormented by Dr. John’s unsympathetic heart for her condition. With three kids to take care of, the mother is attempting to find humor and reflections amidst the chaos she is undergoing. When her husband was on overnight call, she could pack up the kids and head over to the h ospital for a visit. The kid could get some much needed father time and Dr. John always took a break from a very long shift.Advertising Looking for essay on gender studies? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In conclusion, the three stories clearly present the world’s perception towards women who are in constant struggles to gain control over their fates. They show us what a women’s life would have been if they remained silent without any struggle. Although they are fictions, but there is a lot we can learn from them. Works Cited Beer, Janet. The Cambridge Companion to Kate Chopin. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print. Gilman, Charlotte P.†That Rare Jewel.† Women’s Journal 17 May 1890: 158. â€Å"The Yellow Wall-Paper† and Other Stories. Ed. Robert Shulman. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995. 20-24 Hicks, Jennifer. An Analysis of the Story of an Hour. 1999. 20 April, 2011. http://www.eliteskills.com/c/6576 Mikolajczyk, Michael. Literary analysis of Marge Piercy’s Barbie Doll. 2009. Web. Ostman, Heather. Kate Chopin in the Twenty-First Century: New Critical Essays Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars, 2008. Print. This essay on Women Struggling From Their Fate was written and submitted by user Frances Morse to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.